Cursor is an AI-first code editor — a fork of VS Code rebuilt from the ground up with AI woven into every layer of the development experience. We rate it 82/100 — the best AI code editor available in 2026 for professional developers who want deep codebase understanding and autonomous agent automation, though recent pricing and stability issues hold it back from a perfect score.

What is Cursor?

Cursor was built by Anysphere, a San Francisco startup co-founded in 2022 by Michael Truell, Sualeh Asif, Arvid Lunnemark, and Aman Sanger. The premise was simple but radical: instead of bolting AI onto an existing editor via plugins, rebuild the editor itself with AI as a first-class citizen. Because Cursor is a fork of VS Code, developers can migrate their entire setup — themes, extensions, keybindings — in under five minutes.

The results speak for themselves. By February 2026, Cursor had crossed $2 billion in annualized revenue, doubling from $1 billion in just three months, with over 2 million total users and more than 1 million paying customers. It was Product Hunt's Product of the Year for 2024, and is now used by over half of the Fortune 500.

Cursor AI code editor — main interface showing AI chat panel and multi-file editing — Cursor's interface: the AI chat panel alongside your code, with full codebase context for every suggestion.

Key Features of Cursor

Tab Autocomplete: Cursor's proprietary model predicts multi-line completions with project-wide context, including auto-imports — going beyond single-line suggestions to anticipate entire code blocks.
Agent Mode: Autonomous agents read your codebase, write code across multiple files, run tests, fix errors, and iterate without manual prompting. Agents can also record their work through screenshots and logs for human review.
Codebase Indexing: Cursor semantically indexes your entire repository so the AI understands the relationships between files, functions, and modules at any project scale. This context powers every suggestion and chat interaction.
Cloud Agents: Pro and higher plans include background cloud agents that work on features while you focus elsewhere. Ultra adds 20× the usage of all frontier models.
Multi-Model Support: Supports frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic (Claude), Google (Gemini), xAI (Grok), and Cursor's own models — all switchable per task without leaving the editor.
MCP Integration: Full Model Context Protocol support lets agents connect to external tools, databases, and services through standardized integrations.

Cursor agent mode — autonomous code agent running and testing changes across multiple files — Cursor's Agent mode runs end-to-end tasks, tests its own changes, and presents results for developer review.

What Users Say About Cursor

On Reddit's r/cursor_ai and r/webdev, the most consistently praised feature is multi-file editing with full codebase context. Developers report that suggestions are dramatically more relevant than GitHub Copilot because Cursor understands the whole project — not just the open file. Many users claim 1.5–2× productivity gains on complex tasks. The VS Code parity is widely appreciated: "The learning curve is practically non-existent since you can bring over all your settings, themes, and extensions."

That said, there are real complaints. In mid-2025, Cursor switched from 500 fixed fast responses per month to a usage-based credit model that effectively cut premium requests to ~225/month at the $20 price point — triggering a public backlash and a CEO apology, prompting some users to migrate to Windsurf. On the technical side, recent updates have introduced editor lag, crashes on large codebases, and inconsistent AI output quality, which are recurring topics in community forums and on Hacker News.

Cursor Pricing

Cursor's Hobby tier is permanently free with no credit card required. Paid plans start at $20/month for Pro.

Plan	Price	Key Inclusions
Hobby	Free	Limited Agent requests, limited Tab completions, 2-week Pro trial
Pro	$20/month	Extended Agent limits, all frontier models, MCPs, cloud agents
Pro+	$60/month	Pro + 3× usage on OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini models
Ultra	$200/month	Pro + 20× usage on all models, priority feature access
Teams	$40/user/month	Shared chats and rules, centralized billing, SAML/OIDC SSO, analytics
Enterprise	Custom	Pooled usage, SCIM, AI code tracking API, audit logs, priority support

Who Should Use Cursor?

Best for: Professional developers and engineering teams working on complex, multi-file codebases who want AI that understands the full project. Particularly well-suited for full-stack JavaScript/TypeScript and Python engineers already in the VS Code ecosystem.

Not ideal for: Hobbyists writing simple scripts may not get enough ROI on the $20/month Pro plan. Developers in regulated industries with strict policies about proprietary code leaving the local environment should review Cursor's privacy mode settings carefully before adopting it.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

Full codebase context makes suggestions far more accurate than file-level AI tools like Copilot
VS Code fork means zero migration friction — all existing extensions, themes, and keybindings work
Agent mode handles multi-file, multi-step tasks autonomously with built-in self-testing
Supports every major frontier model (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Grok) in one unified UI
$2B ARR as of February 2026 signals genuine product-market fit and long-term viability

Cons:

Mid-2025 pricing change cut effective premium quota by ~55%, triggering community backlash and a CEO apology
Recent releases have introduced crashes and lag on large repositories, per widespread user reports
No formal affiliate or referral commission program
Cloud-based codebase indexing raises valid privacy concerns for teams working on sensitive proprietary code

Alternatives to Cursor

GitHub Copilot ($10–$19/month) is the most widely deployed AI coding assistant, tightly integrated into VS Code and JetBrains, but lacks Cursor's whole-codebase context and autonomous agent depth. Windsurf by Codeium gained momentum following Cursor's 2025 pricing controversy and offers a similar agent-first model with a more predictable credit system. Zed is a performance-first editor with growing AI features — we reviewed Zed separately for developers who prioritize raw editing speed.

Verdict: Is Cursor Worth It?

For most professional developers working on real-world codebases, Cursor at $20/month justifies itself quickly. The codebase-wide AI context and Agent mode represent a genuine productivity step-change over plugin-based alternatives, and the $2B ARR speaks to real developer conviction. We rate it 82/100: outstanding capabilities held back by a 2025 pricing controversy that damaged trust and ongoing stability issues in recent releases. Start with the free Hobby tier — the 2-week Pro trial will likely convert you.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cursor free?: Yes. Cursor's Hobby plan is permanently free with no credit card required. It includes limited Agent requests and Tab completions, plus a 2-week Pro trial. Paid plans start at $20/month (Pro), $60/month (Pro+), and $200/month (Ultra).
What platforms does Cursor support?: Cursor runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux as a desktop application. There is no web app or mobile version.
How does Cursor compare to GitHub Copilot?: Cursor semantically indexes your entire codebase, while GitHub Copilot primarily works within the currently open file's context window. Cursor's Agent mode handles autonomous multi-file tasks; Copilot's agent features are newer and more limited. Cursor costs $20/month vs. Copilot at $10–$19/month.
Is Cursor open source?: Cursor is not fully open source. It is built on top of VS Code (MIT licensed) but Cursor's AI features and core editor are closed source. A partial public repository is available at github.com/getcursor/cursor.
What happened with Cursor's pricing controversy in 2025?: In mid-2025, Cursor changed from 500 fixed fast premium requests per month to a usage-based credit system, reducing the effective quota at $20/month to roughly 225 requests. The CEO issued a public apology, and a portion of users migrated to competitor Windsurf.

Best OpenClaw Alternatives (2026)

Cursor